Search This Blog

Monday, July 15, 2013

Emily Jeffers: Staff Attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity



Ocean acidification is an under-publicized topic that is doing incredible damage to marine ecosystems around the world. The chemistry is something that is very understood by scientists: as carbon dioxide is pumped from human activities, it is absorbed by the ocean. To maintain chemical equilibrium, some of the carbon dioxide reacts with the water to form carbonic acid. This acid reacts with the water to form bicarbonate ions and hydronium ions. This increase in ion concentration increases the acidity of the water. In our oceans from 1751 to 1994, the acidity has increased almost 30%. A change remotely close to this was about 55 million years ago when “96 percent of all ocean species went extinct”.  This change causes some major disruptions to organisms including depressing their metabolic rates, depressing their immune responses, increasing coral bleaching, harming their reproduction, and disabling shellfish from forming their shells (calcification). Surprisingly, it also makes sound travel faster and longer, making it much harder for organisms to hear if they are accustomed to a specific level of background noise. In a study conducted with the Clownfish , also known as “Nemo”, as acidity increased, “it became harder for Nemo to avoid predators and harder for it to find its way back to its home reef.” All of these harmful effects of ocean acidification come together to result in many populations of species to disappear from their ecosystems.
In the grand scheme of the food web, ocean acidification has more immediate effects on smaller organisms. Corals, phytoplankton, mussels, snails, sea urchins and a whole host of organisms use calcium and carbonate to build their shells or skeletons. As acidity increases, carbonate availability declines therefore making it difficult for these organisms to construct their bone structure and protection. All of these aspects make staying alive almost impossible for small organisms. Tough luck for the animals that feed on them. For example: “20-40% of Pink salmon’s diet is comprised of a type of plankton that is expected to disappear in the next 50 years”. When there is a disruption to any organism that is on a low trophic level, it will have a lasting impact on each trophic level after that. If a human’s main source of food was this Pink Salmon, they will have to change the resources they use to stay alive. Even so, it isn’t just local fisherman who rely on marine organisms, its huge companies as well. Even McDonalds had “Fish McBites” made of Alaskan Cod. The Bay Area will especially feel the hit of ocean acidification. With our giant market of shellfish, the effects of this problem will take a large toll on what seafood we can eat and sell.
This disruption will not only have huge impacts on the resources we take advantage of as food. Humans also know less about the bottom of the ocean than they do about the moon. “Even though we don’t really know what’s there, it’s such a mystery and it’s so awesome to think about all these organisms and ecosystems that are beneath the surface.” Humans have always been fascinated by exploration and it would be such a shame to lose a whole world that we haven’t even really discovered yet. This moral aspect to the problem of ocean acidification of destroying habitats, ecosystems, and diversity is coupled with an economic aspect. Marine ecosystems are especially economically productive. Fisheries provide a “source of protein around the world and a major source of income for fisherman”. Overall, people want to go to the beach to see clean water, no trash, and healthy animals.
Ocean acidification is occurring and there is nothing we can do to completely stop it. However, we can curb the output of CO2 to try and slow the process down. If there is less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the ocean and its natural processes will be able to absorb it at a rate that isn’t as detrimental to organisms. The “number one thing that the government can do is to reduce carbon pollution”. The role of the Center for Biological Diversity comes into play because they work in protecting species by submitting petitions to place them under the Endangered Species Act. Also, they sue the government when it fails to meet the expectations of legislation that is already in place. There needs to be much more serious laws to reduce carbon output. Luckily Obama’s New Climate Change Plan begins to address the necessity of cutting down emissions from existing, dirty, power plants. It also promises to provide subsidies for cleaner technologies. Although climate change is what is being addressed in Obama’s plan, ocean acidification will be affected as well. Also known as “Climate Change’s Evil Twin”, ocean acidification needs to be addressed hand in hand with greenhouse gas pollution.
If you are interested in finding more information about Jeffers and the Center for Biological Diversity, go to www.biologicaldiversity.org

-Julia Hansen, EarthScope Reporter

No comments:

Post a Comment