Search This Blog

Monday, July 11, 2016

Behind the Scenes at Channel 7

By Maggie Alves

Every day, we are bombarded by vast amounts of information coming through a variety of mediums. Whether on television, on a computer, an alert on our phones, or via social media, we rarely consider how it’s all getting there. What does it take to accurately deliver crucial information in a matter of minutes? The answer is found at ABC Channel 7. Last Wednesday, the Earthscope team got an exclusive tour of the newsroom led by the acclaimed Cheryl Jennings. We arrived in time to speak to some of the journalists and reporters before the 11 a.m. segment. Each spoke of their journey to get to where they are now: sitting in front of a camera delivering news to thousands around the Bay Area. Each recommended taking every opportunity presented and working tirelessly, whether your shift starts at two in the morning or at noon. At all hours, information is coming in to the station and being evaluated, scripts are written and edited, and reporters are sent into the field to receive the scripts and read them live on camera. At Channel 7, the hard work never stops.

No one embodies hard work and dedication like Cheryl Jennings. On our tour, Jennings emphasized the power of a first impression. She taught us how to give a professional handshake and that we should “always have something to say” when meeting someone for the first time. When she was an aspiring journalist, there were no women in the field to look up to. Her professionalism and work ethic demanded her respect in the office and landed her a spot as one of the first female news anchors in the United States. Hearing her advice was a privilege and we were so lucky to get a tour from her before she retires this year. Overall, my experience at Channel 7 opened my eyes to what it takes to deliver entertaining news rapidly to our screens.


Backstage at Channel 7 News

by Alexandra Lee

The lively, professional atmosphere inside the standard-looking office building of the ABC Channel 7 News Station was anything but dull. The harmony of each televised reporter, producer, scriptwriter, assignment manager, and cameraman working as a team to produce the live news demonstrated expertise, efficiency, and extreme coordination. On our tour to the news station, led by the famous Cheryl Jennings, we were introduced to several televised reporters such as Kristen Sze, Reggie Aqui, and Jessica Castro. We were even lucky enough to see them report live for the 11 a.m. news on July 6. We stepped into the control room while the news was rolling to witness three essential members of the team in action. One man had an extremely difficult job; he had to cue each reporter 10 seconds before they would be live, tell others when to switch the camera image, and simultaneously juggle several other tasks. One woman was in charge of scrolling the ad-libs for each reporter, while another remained in contact with the other producers, ensuring that everything ran smoothly. Every person in the newsroom was on time and extremely concentrated, as necessary for the show to run perfectly.
One concern mentioned by Jennings was that broadcast journalism might become jeopardized, with more and more people reading news on the internet instead of tuning in to watch the live reports on television. Channel 7 has been incorporating social media posts into their reports as a way to stay updated and modern, and appeal to more people. The rest of our visit consisted of practicing handshakes and chatting with Jennings, as she specified how important it is to make a good first impression; learning the different backgrounds of some of the reporters; and being introduced to various other important members of the Channel 7 unit. The Earthscope team was so fortunate to be able to witness the amazing action and coordination behind the scenes at the ABC Channel 7 news station.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Behind the Scenes at ABC7 News

By Miranda Andrade



 This last Wednesday, we had the wonderful opportunity to visit the ABC Channel 7 Newsroom and see what it is really behind the scenes. On this visit we got the chance to take a tour of the ABC Channel 7 news building with one of the most famous woman broadcasters, Cheryl Jennings. Prior to the tour, I hadn’t thought a lot about the amount of effort needed in either preparation or execution of a newscast and when we arrived at the newsroom, I was shocked. Right when we walked in the door, there were rows of desks full of people researching and gathering information for new stories. We came at the perfect time, which allowed us to see watch the live 11 AM news from inside the control room. In that room there were screens covering one big wall allowing the director and producer to see all the different videos that they are able to queue up. The director was also in charge of the sound from every clip and telling the anchors when they were going to be up on screen. In my opinion this was one of the hardest jobs that I saw. After the show, we got to speak to a couple of the anchors who were very excited to meet with us and tell us about how they got to where they were and what it really takes to be a news anchor.

Even though this channel is so successful, broadcasting is a dying medium because of the role the internet now plays in our lives. Due to our constant use of technology, it is no longer necessary to watch a two hour newscast because all the information we could ever want or need is at our fingertips. Another side effect of the over use of technology is that attentions spans have grown smaller and people are less likely to pay attention to full news stories. However, Channel 7 is evolving in order to communicate better in this day and age. Many of their stories are now under two minutes in order to keep viewers’ attention. There is also a larger trend in incorporating social media, such as Twitter and Facebook, into broadcasts while also creates a more interactive show. With these improvements, this news channel can continue to compete in this evolving world.

Sunday, April 17, 2016

It's Time to Face Facts: We Must Power Down Fossil Fuel Consumption Now

By Sophie Strauss

Scientists today from all over the world have begun to realize the possible catastrophic effects of climate change that are facing our world today. These effects are happening quickly and are happening now, even though we may not all see it. The question is, are humans going to be able to come up with alternative energy sources fast enough? And if not, what economic sacrifices are going to have to be made in order for the human race to be able to go on as a whole?

The EarthScope reporter team interviewed Richard Heinberg, one of the world’s foremost peak oil experts, and the author of 12 books including his latest Afterburn: Society Beyond Fossil Fuels. He is also a senior fellow at the Post Carbon institute and has spoken to hundreds of audiences in 14 countries.

“Climate change requires us to change our energy sources. Fossil fuels have been our main energy sources for decades now and they are economically very powerful; there are fuels that are energy dense and easily portable. They have really fueled economic growth in a way that nothing else ever has before… but of course burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide which is a principal greenhouse gas and so everyone who looks at the problem of climate change seriously comes to the conclusion that the only way that we are going to deal with this problem over the long term is to reduce our use of fossil fuels.”

Fossil fuels are the core reason for climate change. If humans want to solve the climate change crisis, there has to be a limit on the amount of fossil fuels being burned and people are going to need to find alternative energy sources. But, scientists agree that global warming is happening now and happening fast. So what if we can't find alternative energy sources before earth reaches the point of no return? According to the NOAA, the “point of no return” for our world's climate will have been reached by 2042. This doesn't give us much time to come up with new innovations without controlling our use of fossil fuels.

According to Richard Heinberg, “We are going have to be powering down our use of fossil fuels probably more rapidly than we are going to be able to replace them so that means we are going to have to give up some of our economic growth we have come to expect, we may even have to find ways to shrink our overall consumption of energy and resources… and again that is not something that politicians or ordinary people want to think about.”

Monday, April 4, 2016

Exxon's Lie

By Earthscope Media Reporter Adam Vogel
A recently published investigative series from Inside Climate News suggests that Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest publicly traded international oil and gas company, knew about the dangers of climate change as far back as the 1970’s. The corporation became aware of rising levels of Carbon Dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere, even before members of the public and the government. The investigation also suggests that all of the major oil providers, not just Exxon Mobil, were aware of the ramifications of non-renewable energy usage. And yet, almost all of these companies continued to spend millions of dollars over the next decades in an effort to sway public opinion by discrediting the science that acknowledged climate change.
Exxon scientists had been warning executives of the dangers of climate change as early as the late 1970s. In July of 1977, Exxon’s senior scientist James Black warned Exxon’s management committee of the possible future ramifications of fossil fuel use. Other Exxon scientists even continued to model a projection of the earth’s climate in the 1980’s, predicting that the earth’s temperature would increase as a result of the oil industry’s fossil fuel dependence. The predictions espoused in these models have for the most part come true as of today.
In addition to Exxon’s own scientific investigations, the American Petroleum Institute alongside the nation’s largest oil companies began a task force that conducted new research on the effects of fossil fuels on the climate. The investigation ran between 1979 and 1983, and gave the oil industry irrefutable truth that climate change was occurring, and posed an immediate danger for the earth and its inhabitants. It was from this program that Exxon, along with the rest of the oil industry, first became aware of the dangers their industry posed for the earth’s climate.
Exxon management did not completely ignore the data presented to them; at first, they actually depended on it and used it to adjust their own environmental practices . They used the same climate data from their climate models in an effort to slow the melting of the Arctic ice cap, so as to mitigate the global perception that the earth’s climate might have been warming. Behind the scenes, Exxon was fully aware of the effect their greenhouse emissions were having on the atmosphere. When addressing the public however, Exxon seemed to blow off new studies that pointed towards a rising global temperature. Instead of admitting what they already knew to be true, they spent millions of dollars (Greenpeace estimates the number to be around 30 million dollars) in an effort to convince the public that climate change was not occurring. They even went so far as to create the Global Climate Coalition, a program whose sole purpose it was to discredit scientific research that called for action against climate change. By the 1990’s, Exxon spearheaded a new movement within the oil industry built around planting misinformation about climate change. Exxon’s efforts paid off; in 1998 the United States along with China and India refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, much at the urging of the oil industry.

Dr. James Powell, a respected geologist and environmentalist, views corporate cover-ups like these as a major obstacle preventing Washington from taking action on climate change. Powell claims that most right wing politicians 15 years ago would not have attempted to discredit climate change, as they do today. In a recent interview with Earthscope Media, Powell says that over the last 15 years there has been “A campaign of doubt, deceit, misinformation, lies, by a group of so called ‘think-tanks’... funded by Exxon Mobil and private right wing foundations. And they have won so far… they have managed to sway public opinion, and they have really turned man-made global warming from a scientific into a political issue.”

Monday, December 7, 2015

College Student Helps Lead Campaign that has Divested over one Billion Dollars from the Fossil Fuel Businesses

By Earthscope Media Reporter, Jillian Johns
Fossil fuels have been proven to release harmful greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere and the recent integration of the process of hydraulic fracturing only exacerbates the harmful effects the usage of these fuels have on our environment and ourselves. Jess Grady-Benson is a leader in the Fossil Fuel Divestment Student Network, which aims to help people divest from using fossil fuels. She also recently won a Brower Youth Award for her work. As a recent graduate of Pitzer College in Claremont, California, she has left behind an inspirational legacy. Pitzer is part of the Claremont Colleges, a group of five colleges in which students can attend classes at any of these participating schools when needed.
Benson co-funded the Claremont College Fossil Fuel Divestment Student Network--a group of highly intelligent and determined individuals that influenced the college so much that they recently agreed to switch to alternative fuels and away from the fossil fuel industry. Now, as more than one hundred schools followed suit, the total savings on energy cost is expected to reach one billion dollars.
Students rallying for the divestment of fossil fuels. (http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/02/18/next-phase-fossil-fuel-divestment-movement-escalation)
“This campaign, I think, is incredibly powerful because it’s really redistributing wealth, it’s building a powerful base of young activists on student campuses, and it is also opening up a political window so that we can actually shift public conjugate...lower influence of fossil fuel industry elections and policy in general, and [the upcoming generations] are all really critical to transitioning us to a cleaner and more just economy,” Benson stated. Not only does the public receive more opportunities to improve their living costs and standards, they also create an improved community aspect of accomplishing something that helps everyone, not just an elite few.   
Benson also stated that, “I think the transition into a cleaner economy is actually an opportunity to redistribute wealth, create more community ownership and democratic practice around community energy production and usage, create more jobs at a local level that is actually empowering the community and move us away from the corporate control that we see over the energy economy currently.”
In discontinuing our uses of products distributed by hugely powerful corporations, we gain a more locally based system, allowing for personal needs to become higher on the list of priorities. By divesting from fossil fuels, we can help save our earth, our atmosphere, our community, and ourselves.
Our tremendous thanks to Jess Grady-Benson. For more on her incredible work, visit http://www.studentsdivest.org/.


Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Could a watery grave be coming for local salmon populations?

Could a watery grave be coming for local salmon populations? 
Humans must look to fix a problem they single-handedly began
by Katherine Podoll

The Salmon population is devastatingly low in Northern California, and it is only getting worse. Over the past decades, a steady decline in these species has led to an in depth investigation of what, exactly, has caused this decline. Salmon are what is known as a keystone species for all other organisms living near or around a creek, meaning that they proved important resources for the surrounding species. Salmon, whose lifecycle brings them from a creek out to the ocean and back to the same creek to spawn and die, carry important nutrients inland which can be spread through the ecosystem by species such as insects and trees, known as vectors. Preston Brown is a biologist who works for SPAWN, an organization based in West Marin whose focus is on preserving and restoring salmon habitat through the restoration of the local Lagunitas Creek as well as reigning in the support of those along other endangered areas throughout Northern California. Brown said that one of the most intriguing things about salmon to him was how “they recycle huge amounts of marine fertilizer into the streams and the forest.” In fact, “some scientists a long time ago figured out that redwood trees that grow next to salmon creeks grew bigger and taller than trees that grew away from salmon creeks." Now what, people have been asking, is the most prominent reason for the Coho Salmon's decline, if they are such a critical species? This blame, like so many others, must be placed solely on ourselves, human beings.
With the increase of man-made infrastructure in recent years, people have looked to turn to anything available to get their resources from. In the mid to late 1900s, dams became a popular form of infrastructure to control water in given areas and also create energy from this water. However, this practice has revealed more problems than solutions. Brown explained how “developing this one resource, water, came at the expense of all the other resources: salmon and wildlife, and the processes in which these forests grow and floodplains are developed and nutrients are deposited, because dams interrupt a lot of natural processes.”
In addition to providing issues on its own, dams exacerbate all other problems in an ecosystem as well. The drought which has plagued California the past four years has, according to Brown, simply been the piece which pushed the salmon over the edge. He describes how over the tens of thousands of years of their existence, the Coho Salmon have experienced other serious droughts and environmental changes, but “because they’re in such low numbers, because they are usually bumping up against the needs of humans, they’re getting even less water in the drought.” The drought is the “nail in the coffin,” Brown says, grimly adding, “and the coffin was built by us.”

Therefore, as the primary cause of such catastrophic ecological problems, it is up to us to fix them, as well. Brown and SPAWN work around the clock in the Lagunitas Watershed to restore destroyed habitat along the creek in order to create a more inviting and safe place for returning salmon. In addition, people in watersheds around Northern California, the United States, and even the world, are working to reduce infrastructure near waterways. “The era of big dams is over,” remarks Brown. He explains how in some places, people are taking dams down due to their environmental harm and cost of upkeeping. In addition, bills are being created to protect these areas, and most simply need a stamp of approval before they are put into action. People are making a difference on a personal level, too, by spreading awareness about salmon issues and working to restore their local watershed. No matter what else is going on in our lives, no matter what other issues present themselves as urgent at a particular moment, it is always essential to remember: it is our fault salmon are in the endangered position they are today, and therefore it is our duty to do everything in our power to fix it.

To learn more about SPAWN or how you can help out, visit their website: https://seaturtles.org/programs/salmon/